Manufacturers and Consumers Report Great Differences

A few days ago, Jin Qishi reported the news that he was suspected to have caused infant rickets, which attracted the attention of parents in the provincial capital. The incident was reheated with the release of the Jinqi Shi report, and there were two versions of the product inspection report. During the interview, the reporter learned that, influenced by the two inspection reports, Jin Qishi continued to sit on the bench in the provincial capital. At the same time, the lawyer said that for consumers who want to jointly defend their rights, lawyers may find it difficult to obtain evidence.

A few days ago, under the influence of “Shumen”, Jin Qishi sent cod liver oil and milk calcium products to the Guangdong Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau for inspection. The results showed that both products were produced in Norway, and the certificates of origin and health certificates were complete. , Microorganisms, heavy metals and other indicators are qualified, and labeling complies with national regulations. On the 16th, the Jinqi Shi product report submitted by several parents in Hangzhou has also been released. According to a test report from the Zhejiang Justice Testing Center, Jin Qi Shi infant milk calcium capsule (6 months to 3 years old) products, including protein The content of the package is 2.8g/100g, but the actual test result is 0.95g/100g; and the sodium content is marked on the product packaging as 0mg, and the test result is as high as 227mg. In addition, each piece of vitamin A labeled on the packaging of Vitamin A in Cochin liver oil (1 to 3 years old) is 900 IU, but the actual detection result is 1090 IU. Compared with the labeling, the test results do not match the labels on the package.

During the interview, the reporter called Jin Qishi. A staff member of its customer service department who asked not to be named claimed that the number of products sent by consumers was small and could only be considered as an example. It could not reflect the most real data and stated that “non-quality issues Jin Qi Shi does not accept returns."

In the face of the factory's righteousness, “return is not refundable”, the provincial dealers do not buy it, even if there are qualified inspection report manufacturers, the current maternal and child stores are still not re-released on the Jin Qi Shi, and there is a business simply Say that he has never sold the product in order to get rid of the relationship.

At the same time, a consensus was reached for members of the National QQ Group who have expressed their desire to unite in rights protection and have alliances with victims. However, Chen lawyer of Shandong Jiugong Chen Law Firm stated that consumer rights protection is not easy. "The most important thing is to collect evidence, prove that the child is because of eating the product caused by the disease." According to reports, whether it is manufacturers or consumers, find their own test results of the identification agencies, the court generally does not recognize, and at the same time, whether or not Suspected of false propaganda, consumers have to obtain evidence, which is more difficult.